Show Notes
1. Why high performance teams need a shared performance modelHaving experts from different disciplines around the table does not automatically create an effective performance team. Katie and Jamie explain why coaches need to clearly articulate what performance looks like and how a shared model allows every practitioner to understand where their expertise fits.2. Turning performance meetings into actual collaborationWhy meetings can become dominated by updates, individual disciplines, and unnecessary detail, and how better preparation and structure can create more time for meaningful discussion. Katie and Jamie share how their approach shifted meetings from coaches primarily delivering information to a much more balanced contribution across the entire team.3. Why disagreement between practitioners can improve performanceDifferent specialists will not always agree on the best intervention, and that is not necessarily a problem. The key is connecting each proposed approach back to the performance model, creating space for different perspectives, making a decision, and then reassessing whether it actually produced the intended outcome.4. Defining training quality beyond hitting the numbersTraining quality is more than achieving a target speed, distance, or physiological response. The discussion explores how physical, technical, tactical, and mental objectives can be evaluated together to determine whether athletes are actually executing training in the way it was intended.5. Building a feedback loop from athlete profiling to performancePerformance Centred Practice connects athlete profiling, training design, monitoring, and performance analysis into one decision making process. The goal is not another rigid framework, but a common language that helps teams identify what an athlete needs now, provide the right support, and continually evaluate whether preparation is moving in the right direction.
